Scientific arguments against carbon dating invalidating mother inlaw

Scientists, on the other hand, “observe the natural world and follow those observations wherever they lead.” “Constrained as they are by their view of biblical chronology, young-Earth creationists infer that the seven days of creation occurred less than 10,000 years ago, and that the next significant event in the history of the Earth and of life was the flood of Noah.

It says God created the heavens and the Earth in six days, so it must be so.Anderson says he could marshal any number of scientific arguments to prove that the biblical global flood happened as it is described in Genesis, from inaccuracies in radiocarbon dating to gaps in the fossil record to superfine stratification of sedimentary layers around Mount St. Scientists say it just doesn’t work that way Creation theory has always driven mainstream scientists nuts.But scientific young-Earth creationism is a special case.“It is good in that it actually reports geological observations.It is bad because it ignores the scientific method in interpreting them.” Elders, a former chairman of the Education Committee of the Geothermal Resources Council of the U. A., said young-Earth creationists make a fundamental error: They start with their conclusion — that God created the Earth in six days — and then look for the proof.